↓ Skip to main content

Rare Neural Correlations Implement Robotic Conditioning with Delayed Rewards and Disturbances

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare Neural Correlations Implement Robotic Conditioning with Delayed Rewards and Disturbances
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Soltoggio, Andre Lemme, Felix Reinhart, Jochen J. Steil

Abstract

Neural conditioning associates cues and actions with following rewards. The environments in which robots operate, however, are pervaded by a variety of disturbing stimuli and uncertain timing. In particular, variable reward delays make it difficult to reconstruct which previous actions are responsible for following rewards. Such an uncertainty is handled by biological neural networks, but represents a challenge for computational models, suggesting the lack of a satisfactory theory for robotic neural conditioning. The present study demonstrates the use of rare neural correlations in making correct associations between rewards and previous cues or actions. Rare correlations are functional in selecting sparse synapses to be eligible for later weight updates if a reward occurs. The repetition of this process singles out the associating and reward-triggering pathways, and thereby copes with distal rewards. The neural network displays macro-level classical and operant conditioning, which is demonstrated in an interactive real-life human-robot interaction. The proposed mechanism models realistic conditioning in humans and animals and implements similar behaviors in neuro-robotic platforms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
France 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 31 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 31%
Psychology 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#5,668,528
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#121
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,534
of 281,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.