↓ Skip to main content

An intrinsic value system for developing multiple invariant representations with incremental slowness learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An intrinsic value system for developing multiple invariant representations with incremental slowness learning
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Luciw, Varun Kompella, Sohrob Kazerounian, Juergen Schmidhuber

Abstract

Curiosity Driven Modular Incremental Slow Feature Analysis (CD-MISFA;) is a recently introduced model of intrinsically-motivated invariance learning. Artificial curiosity enables the orderly formation of multiple stable sensory representations to simplify the agent's complex sensory input. We discuss computational properties of the CD-MISFA model itself as well as neurophysiological analogs fulfilling similar functional roles. CD-MISFA combines 1. unsupervised representation learning through the slowness principle, 2. generation of an intrinsic reward signal through learning progress of the developing features, and 3. balancing of exploration and exploitation to maximize learning progress and quickly learn multiple feature sets for perceptual simplification. Experimental results on synthetic observations and on the iCub robot show that the intrinsic value system is essential for representation learning. Representations are typically explored and learned in order from least to most costly, as predicted by the theory of curiosity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 17 25%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 35%
Engineering 15 22%
Psychology 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#496
of 1,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,604
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,039 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.