↓ Skip to main content

Temporal sequence learning in winner-take-all networks of spiking neurons demonstrated in a brain-based device

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal sequence learning in winner-take-all networks of spiking neurons demonstrated in a brain-based device
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey L. McKinstry, Gerald M. Edelman

Abstract

Animal behavior often involves a temporally ordered sequence of actions learned from experience. Here we describe simulations of interconnected networks of spiking neurons that learn to generate patterns of activity in correct temporal order. The simulation consists of large-scale networks of thousands of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that exhibit short-term synaptic plasticity and spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity. The neural architecture within each area is arranged to evoke winner-take-all (WTA) patterns of neural activity that persist for tens of milliseconds. In order to generate and switch between consecutive firing patterns in correct temporal order, a reentrant exchange of signals between these areas was necessary. To demonstrate the capacity of this arrangement, we used the simulation to train a brain-based device responding to visual input by autonomously generating temporal sequences of motor actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 4%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Engineering 8 16%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,311,094
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#256
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,531
of 280,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.