↓ Skip to main content

Curiosity driven reinforcement learning for motion planning on humanoids

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Curiosity driven reinforcement learning for motion planning on humanoids
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikhail Frank, Jürgen Leitner, Marijn Stollenga, Alexander Förster, Jürgen Schmidhuber

Abstract

Most previous work on artificial curiosity (AC) and intrinsic motivation focuses on basic concepts and theory. Experimental results are generally limited to toy scenarios, such as navigation in a simulated maze, or control of a simple mechanical system with one or two degrees of freedom. To study AC in a more realistic setting, we embody a curious agent in the complex iCub humanoid robot. Our novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework consists of a state-of-the-art, low-level, reactive control layer, which controls the iCub while respecting constraints, and a high-level curious agent, which explores the iCub's state-action space through information gain maximization, learning a world model from experience, controlling the actual iCub hardware in real-time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ever embodied, curious agent for real-time motion planning on a humanoid. We demonstrate that it can learn compact Markov models to represent large regions of the iCub's configuration space, and that the iCub explores intelligently, showing interest in its physical constraints as well as in objects it finds in its environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 32%
Student > Master 36 22%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 51 31%
Engineering 43 26%
Psychology 10 6%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,926,689
of 25,349,102 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#195
of 1,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,238
of 319,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,029 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.