↓ Skip to main content

Re-framing bio-plausible collision detection: identifying shared meta-properties through strategic prototyping

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-framing bio-plausible collision detection: identifying shared meta-properties through strategic prototyping
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1349498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haotian Wu, Shigang Yue, Cheng Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,655,035
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#642
of 1,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,017
of 230,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.