↓ Skip to main content

Cardioid oscillator-based pattern generator for imitating the time-ratio-asymmetrical behavior of the lower limb exoskeleton

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardioid oscillator-based pattern generator for imitating the time-ratio-asymmetrical behavior of the lower limb exoskeleton
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1379906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiang Fu, Tianhong Luo, TingQiong Cui, Xiangyu Ma, Shuang Liang, Yi Huang, Shengxue Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,947,260
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#677
of 1,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,338
of 225,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,056 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.