↓ Skip to main content

Gephyrin, the enigmatic organizer at GABAergic synapses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gephyrin, the enigmatic organizer at GABAergic synapses
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2012.00023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Tretter, Jayanta Mukherjee, Hans-Michael Maric, Hermann Schindelin, Werner Sieghart, Stephen J. Moss

Abstract

GABA(A) receptors are clustered at synaptic sites to achieve a high density of postsynaptic receptors opposite the input axonal terminals. This allows for an efficient propagation of GABA mediated signals, which mostly result in neuronal inhibition. A key organizer for inhibitory synaptic receptors is the 93 kDa protein gephyrin that forms oligomeric superstructures beneath the synaptic area. Gephyrin has long been known to be directly associated with glycine receptor β subunits that mediate synaptic inhibition in the spinal cord. Recently, synaptic GABA(A) receptors have also been shown to directly interact with gephyrin and interaction sites have been identified and mapped within the intracellular loops of the GABA(A) receptor α1, α2, and α3 subunits. Gephyrin-binding to GABA(A) receptors seems to be at least one order of magnitude weaker than to glycine receptors (GlyRs) and most probably is regulated by phosphorylation. Gephyrin not only has a structural function at synaptic sites, but also plays a crucial role in synaptic dynamics and is a platform for multiple protein-protein interactions, bringing receptors, cytoskeletal proteins and downstream signaling proteins into close spatial proximity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 237 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 28%
Researcher 39 16%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 34%
Neuroscience 62 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 40 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,436
of 4,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,794
of 244,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.