↓ Skip to main content

Refuting the challenges of the developmental shift of polarity of GABA actions: GABA more exciting than ever!

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Refuting the challenges of the developmental shift of polarity of GABA actions: GABA more exciting than ever!
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2012.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yehezkel Ben-Ari, Melanie A. Woodin, Evelyne Sernagor, Laura Cancedda, Laurent Vinay, Claudio Rivera, Pascal Legendre, Heiko J. Luhmann, Angelique Bordey, Peter Wenner, Atsuo Fukuda, Anthony N. van den Pol, Jean-Luc Gaiarsa, Enrico Cherubini

Abstract

DURING BRAIN DEVELOPMENT, THERE IS A PROGRESSIVE REDUCTION OF INTRACELLULAR CHLORIDE ASSOCIATED WITH A SHIFT IN GABA POLARITY: GABA depolarizes and occasionally excites immature neurons, subsequently hyperpolarizing them at later stages of development. This sequence, which has been observed in a wide range of animal species, brain structures and preparations, is thought to play an important role in activity-dependent formation and modulation of functional circuits. This sequence has also been considerably reinforced recently with new data pointing to an evolutionary preserved rule. In a recent "Hypothesis and Theory Article," the excitatory action of GABA in early brain development is suggested to be "an experimental artefact" (Bregestovski and Bernard, 2012). The authors suggest that the excitatory action of GABA is due to an inadequate/insufficient energy supply in glucose-perfused slices and/or to the damage produced by the slicing procedure. However, these observations have been repeatedly contradicted by many groups and are inconsistent with a large body of evidence including the fact that the developmental shift is neither restricted to slices nor to rodents. We summarize the overwhelming evidence in support of both excitatory GABA during development, and the implications this has in developmental neurobiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Japan 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 247 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 24%
Researcher 64 24%
Student > Master 33 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 34%
Neuroscience 68 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,666,857
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,539
of 4,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,697
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.