↓ Skip to main content

Interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α: reliable targets for protective therapies in Parkinson’s Disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α: reliable targets for protective therapies in Parkinson’s Disease?
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2013.00053
Pubmed ID
Authors

María C. Leal, Juan C. Casabona, Mariana Puntel, Fernando J. Pitossi

Abstract

Neuroinflammation has received increased attention as a target for putative neuroprotective therapies in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Two prototypic pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) have been implicated as main effectors of the functional consequences of neuroinflammation on neurodegeneration in PD models. In this review, we describe that the functional interaction between these cytokines in the brain differs from the periphery (e.g., their expression is not induced by each other) and present data showing predominantly a toxic effect of these cytokines when expressed at high doses and for a sustained period of time in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SN). In addition, we highlight opposite evidence showing protective effects of these two main cytokines when conditions of duration, amount of expression or state of activation of the target or neighboring cells are changed. Furthermore, we discuss these results in the frame of previous disappointing results from anti-TNF-α clinical trials against Multiple Sclerosis, another neurodegenerative disease with a clear neuroinflammatory component. In conclusion, we hypothesize that the available evidence suggests that the duration and dose of IL-1β or TNF-α expression is crucial to predict their functional effect on the SN. Since these parameters are not amenable for measurement in the SN of PD patients, we call for an in-depth analysis to identify downstream mediators that could be common to the toxic (and not the protective) effects of these cytokines in the SN. This strategy could spare the possible neuroprotective effect of these cytokines operative in the patient at the time of treatment, increasing the probability of efficacy in a clinical setting. Alternatively, receptor-specific agonists or antagonists could also provide a way to circumvent undesired effects of general anti-inflammatory or specific anti-IL-1β or TNF-α therapies against PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 48 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 61 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,548,690
of 24,205,409 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#396
of 4,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,682
of 288,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#13
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,205,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.