↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs in the axon and presynaptic nerve terminal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNAs in the axon and presynaptic nerve terminal
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2013.00126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry B. Kaplan, Amar N. Kar, Anthony E. Gioio, Armaz Aschrafi

Abstract

The distal structural/functional domains of the neuron, to include the axon and presynaptic nerve terminal, contain a large, heterogeneous population of mRNAs and an active protein synthetic system. These local components of the genetic expression machinery play a critical role in the development, function, and long-term viability of the neuron. In addition to the local mRNA populations these presynaptic domains contain a significant number of non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. Here, we review a small, but rapidly evolving literature on the composition and function of microRNAs that regulate gene expression locally in the axon and nerve terminal. In this capacity, these small regulatory RNAs have a profound effect on axonal protein synthesis, local energy metabolism, and the modulation of axonal outgrowth and branching.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 48%
Neuroscience 14 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,022,832
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#816
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,139
of 280,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#28
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.