↓ Skip to main content

How do astrocytes shape synaptic transmission? Insights from electrophysiology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do astrocytes shape synaptic transmission? Insights from electrophysiology
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2013.00159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenn Dallérac, Oana Chever, Nathalie Rouach

Abstract

A major breakthrough in neuroscience has been the realization in the last decades that the dogmatic view of astroglial cells as being merely fostering and buffering elements of the nervous system is simplistic. A wealth of investigations now shows that astrocytes actually participate in the control of synaptic transmission in an active manner. This was first hinted by the intimate contacts glial processes make with neurons, particularly at the synaptic level, and evidenced using electrophysiological and calcium imaging techniques. Calcium imaging has provided critical evidence demonstrating that astrocytic regulation of synaptic efficacy is not a passive phenomenon. However, given that cellular activation is not only represented by calcium signaling, it is also crucial to assess concomitant mechanisms. We and others have used electrophysiological techniques to simultaneously record neuronal and astrocytic activity, thus enabling the study of multiple ionic currents and in depth investigation of neuro-glial dialogues. In the current review, we focus on the input such approach has provided in the understanding of astrocyte-neuron interactions underlying control of synaptic efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 354 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 26%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 58 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 120 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 5%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 63 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,571,342
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#170
of 4,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,015
of 293,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#6
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.