↓ Skip to main content

Diversity of layer 5 projection neurons in the mouse motor cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diversity of layer 5 projection neurons in the mouse motor cortex
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2013.00174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manfred J. Oswald, Malinda L. S. Tantirigama, Ivo Sonntag, Stephanie M. Hughes, Ruth M. Empson

Abstract

In the primary motor cortex (M1), layer 5 projection neurons signal directly to distant motor structures to drive movement. Despite their pivotal position and acknowledged diversity these neurons are traditionally separated into broad commissural and corticofugal types, and until now no attempt has been made at resolving the basis for their diversity. We therefore probed the electrophysiological and morphological properties of retrogradely labeled M1 corticospinal (CSp), corticothalamic (CTh), and commissural projecting corticostriatal (CStr) and corticocortical (CC) neurons. An unsupervised cluster analysis established at least four phenotypes with additional differences between lumbar and cervical projecting CSp neurons. Distinguishing parameters included the action potential (AP) waveform, firing behavior, the hyperpolarisation-activated sag potential, sublayer position, and soma and dendrite size. CTh neurons differed from CSp neurons in showing spike frequency acceleration and a greater sag potential. CStr neurons had the lowest AP amplitude and maximum rise rate of all neurons. Temperature influenced spike train behavior in corticofugal neurons. At 26°C CTh neurons fired bursts of APs more often than CSp neurons, but at 36°C both groups fired regular APs. Our findings provide reliable phenotypic fingerprints to identify distinct M1 projection neuron classes as a tool to understand their unique contributions to motor function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 201 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Master 8 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 138 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 29 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Engineering 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 138 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,230
of 4,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,074
of 280,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#142
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.