↓ Skip to main content

Chemokines in the balance: maintenance of homeostasis and protection at CNS barriers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemokines in the balance: maintenance of homeostasis and protection at CNS barriers
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2014.00154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L. Williams, David W. Holman, Robyn S. Klein

Abstract

In the adult central nervous system (CNS), chemokines and their receptors are involved in developmental, physiological and pathological processes. Although most lines of investigation focus on their ability to induce the migration of cells, recent studies indicate that chemokines also promote cellular interactions and activate signaling pathways that maintain CNS homeostatic functions. Many homeostatic chemokines are expressed on the vasculature of the blood brain barrier (BBB) including CXCL12, CCL19, CCL20, and CCL21. While endothelial cell expression of these chemokines is known to regulate the entry of leukocytes into the CNS during immunosurveillance, new data indicate that CXCL12 is also involved in diverse cellular activities including adult neurogenesis and neuronal survival, having an opposing role to the homeostatic chemokine, CXCL14, which appears to regulate synaptic inputs to neural precursors. Neuronal expression of CX3CL1, yet another homeostatic chemokine that promotes neuronal survival and communication with microglia, is partly regulated by CXCL12. Regulation of CXCL12 is unique in that it may regulate its own expression levels via binding to its scavenger receptor CXCR7/ACKR3. In this review, we explore the diverse roles of these and other homeostatic chemokines expressed within the CNS, including the possible implications of their dysfunction as a cause of neurologic disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 25%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 15%
Neuroscience 22 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 9%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,392
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,557
of 4,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,011
of 226,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#33
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.