↓ Skip to main content

Neuroprotective effects of physical activity on the brain: a closer look at trophic factor signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroprotective effects of physical activity on the brain: a closer look at trophic factor signaling
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2014.00170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristy Phillips, Mehmet Akif Baktir, Malathi Srivatsan, Ahmad Salehi

Abstract

While the relationship between increased physical activity and cognitive ability has been conjectured for centuries, only recently have the mechanisms underlying this relationship began to emerge. Convergent evidence suggests that physical activity offers an affordable and effective method to improve cognitive function in all ages, particularly the elderly who are most vulnerable to neurodegenerative disorders. In addition to improving cardiac and immune function, physical activity alters trophic factor signaling and, in turn, neuronal function and structure in areas critical for cognition. Sustained exercise plays a role in modulating anti-inflammatory effects and may play a role in preserving cognitive function in aging and neuropathological conditions. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that myokines released by exercising muscles affect the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor synthesis in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, a finding that could lead to the identification of new and therapeutically important mediating factors. Given the growing number of individuals with cognitive impairments worldwide, a better understanding of how these factors contribute to cognition is imperative, and constitutes an important first step toward developing non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies to improve cognition in vulnerable populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 444 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 15%
Researcher 48 11%
Student > Bachelor 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 78 17%
Unknown 95 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 16%
Neuroscience 57 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 11%
Sports and Recreations 43 9%
Psychology 39 9%
Other 80 18%
Unknown 117 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,618,553
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#761
of 4,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,272
of 228,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.