↓ Skip to main content

A synaptic mechanism for network synchrony

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A synaptic mechanism for network synchrony
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2014.00290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon T. Alford, Michael H. Alpert

Abstract

Within neural networks, synchronization of activity is dependent upon the synaptic connectivity of embedded microcircuits and the intrinsic membrane properties of their constituent neurons. Synaptic integration, dendritic Ca(2+) signaling, and non-linear interactions are crucial cellular attributes that dictate single neuron computation, but their roles promoting synchrony and the generation of network oscillations are not well understood, especially within the context of a defined behavior. In this regard, the lamprey spinal central pattern generator (CPG) stands out as a well-characterized, conserved vertebrate model of a neural network (Smith et al., 2013a), which produces synchronized oscillations in which neural elements from the systems to cellular level that control rhythmic locomotion have been determined. We review the current evidence for the synaptic basis of oscillation generation with a particular emphasis on the linkage between synaptic communication and its cellular coupling to membrane processes that control oscillatory behavior of neurons within the locomotor network. We seek to relate dendritic function found in many vertebrate systems to the accessible lamprey central nervous system in which the relationship between neural network activity and behavior is well understood. This enables us to address how Ca(2+) signaling in spinal neuron dendrites orchestrate oscillations that drive network behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 23%
Physics and Astronomy 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,380,628
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,241
of 4,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,783
of 249,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#47
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.