You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combined optogenetics and voltage sensitive dye imaging at single cell resolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2014.00311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Willadt, Marco Canepari, Ping Yan, Leslie M. Loew, Kaspar E. Vogt |
| Abstract |
Information processing in the central nervous system makes use of densely woven networks of neurons with complex dendritic and axonal arborizations. Studying signaling in such a network requires precise control over the activity of specific neurons and an understanding how the synaptic signals are integrated. We established a system using a recently published red-shifted voltage sensitive dye in slices from mice expressing channelrhodopsin (Ch) in GABAergic neurons. Using a focused 473 nm laser for Ch activation and 635 nm laser wide field illumination for voltage sensitive dye excitation we were able to simultaneously measure dendritic voltage transients and stimulate inhibitory synaptic connections. The combination of these techniques provides excellent spatiotemporal control over neuron activation and high resolution information on dendritic signal processing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 31 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 28% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,203,052
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,194
of 4,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,058
of 255,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#30
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.