↓ Skip to main content

Versatility of the complement system in neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration and brain homeostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Versatility of the complement system in neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration and brain homeostasis
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2014.00380
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franca Orsini, Daiana De Blasio, Rosalia Zangari, Elisa R. Zanier, Maria-Grazia De Simoni

Abstract

The immune response after brain injury is highly complex and involves both local and systemic events at the cellular and molecular level. It is associated to a dramatic over-activation of enzyme systems, the expression of proinflammatory genes and the activation/recruitment of immune cells. The complement system represents a powerful component of the innate immunity and is highly involved in the inflammatory response. Complement components are synthesized predominantly by the liver and circulate in the bloodstream primed for activation. Moreover, brain cells can produce complement proteins and receptors. After acute brain injury, the rapid and uncontrolled activation of the complement leads to massive release of inflammatory anaphylatoxins, recruitment of cells to the injury site, phagocytosis and induction of blood brain barrier (BBB) damage. Brain endothelial cells are particularly susceptible to complement-mediated effects, since they are exposed to both circulating and locally synthesized complement proteins. Conversely, during neurodegenerative disorders, complement factors play distinct roles depending on the stage and degree of neuropathology. In addition to the deleterious role of the complement, increasing evidence suggest that it may also play a role in normal nervous system development (wiring the brain) and adulthood (either maintaining brain homeostasis or supporting regeneration after brain injury). This article represents a compendium of the current knowledge on the complement role in the brain, prompting a novel view that complement activation can result in either protective or detrimental effects in brain conditions that depend exquisitely on the nature, the timing and the degree of the stimuli that induce its activation. A deeper understanding of the acute, subacute and chronic consequences of complement activation is needed and may lead to new therapeutic strategies, including the ability of targeting selective step in the complement cascade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 221 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 18%
Student > Master 35 16%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Other 10 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 17%
Neuroscience 38 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 50 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#13,923,783
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,024
of 4,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,319
of 262,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#31
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.