↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of sublinear and supralinear dendritic integration to neuronal computations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of sublinear and supralinear dendritic integration to neuronal computations
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Tran-Van-Minh, Romain D. Cazé, Therése Abrahamsson, Laurence Cathala, Boris S. Gutkin, David A. DiGregorio

Abstract

Nonlinear dendritic integration is thought to increase the computational ability of neurons. Most studies focus on how supralinear summation of excitatory synaptic responses arising from clustered inputs within single dendrites result in the enhancement of neuronal firing, enabling simple computations such as feature detection. Recent reports have shown that sublinear summation is also a prominent dendritic operation, extending the range of subthreshold input-output (sI/O) transformations conferred by dendrites. Like supralinear operations, sublinear dendritic operations also increase the repertoire of neuronal computations, but feature extraction requires different synaptic connectivity strategies for each of these operations. In this article we will review the experimental and theoretical findings describing the biophysical determinants of the three primary classes of dendritic operations: linear, sublinear, and supralinear. We then review a Boolean algebra-based analysis of simplified neuron models, which provides insight into how dendritic operations influence neuronal computations. We highlight how neuronal computations are critically dependent on the interplay of dendritic properties (morphology and voltage-gated channel expression), spiking threshold and distribution of synaptic inputs carrying particular sensory features. Finally, we describe how global (scattered) and local (clustered) integration strategies permit the implementation of similar classes of computations, one example being the object feature binding problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 211 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 32%
Researcher 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 82 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 41 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,497,808
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,235
of 4,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,911
of 268,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#46
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.