↓ Skip to main content

Hair cell damage recruited Lgr5-expressing cells are hair cell progenitors in neonatal mouse utricle

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hair cell damage recruited Lgr5-expressing cells are hair cell progenitors in neonatal mouse utricle
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinchao Lin, Xiaodong Zhang, Fengfang Wu, Weinian Lin

Abstract

Damage-activated stem/progenitor cells play important roles in regenerating lost cells and in tissue repair. Previous studies reported that the mouse utricle has limited hair cell regeneration ability after hair cell ablation. However, the potential progenitor cell population regenerating new hair cells remains undiscovered. In this study, we first found that Lgr5, a Wnt target gene that is not usually expressed in the neonatal mouse utricle, can be activated by 24 h neomycin treatment in a sub-population of supporting cells in the striolar region of the neonatal mouse utricle. Lineage tracing demonstrated that these Lgr5-positive supporting cells could regenerate new hair cells in explant culture. We isolated the damage-activated Lgr5-positive cells with flow cytometry and found that these Lgr5-positive supporting cells could regenerate hair cells in vitro, and self-renew to form spheres, which maintained the capacity to differentiate into hair cells over seven generations of passages. Our results suggest that damage-activated Lgr5-positive supporting cells act as hair cell progenitors in the neonatal mouse utricle, which may help to uncover a potential route to regenerate hair cell in mammals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,570
of 4,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,025
of 264,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#89
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.