↓ Skip to main content

Sensory hair cell death and regeneration in fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensory hair cell death and regeneration in fishes
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerry D. Monroe, Gopinath Rajadinakaran, Michael E. Smith

Abstract

Sensory hair cells are specialized mechanotransductive receptors required for hearing and vestibular function. Loss of hair cells in humans and other mammals is permanent and causes reduced hearing and balance. In the early 1980's, it was shown that hair cells continue to be added to the inner ear sensory epithelia in cartilaginous and bony fishes. Soon thereafter, hair cell regeneration was documented in the chick cochlea following acoustic trauma. Since then, research using chick and other avian models has led to great insights into hair cell death and regeneration. However, with the rise of the zebrafish as a model organism for studying disease and developmental processes, there has been an increased interest in studying sensory hair cell death and regeneration in its lateral line and inner ears. Advances derived from studies in zebrafish and other fish species include understanding the effect of ototoxins on hair cells and finding otoprotectants to mitigate ototoxin damage, the role of cellular proliferation vs. direct transdifferentiation during hair cell regeneration, and elucidating cellular pathways involved in the regeneration process. This review will summarize research on hair cell death and regeneration using fish models, indicate the potential strengths and weaknesses of these models, and discuss several emerging areas of future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 25%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 22%
Neuroscience 16 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,826,373
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#973
of 4,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,592
of 279,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#27
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.