↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Rat Model of Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury Simulating Different Damage Degree: Implications for Morphological, Neurological, and Biomarker Changes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Rat Model of Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury Simulating Different Damage Degree: Implications for Morphological, Neurological, and Biomarker Changes
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengdong Liu, Chi Zhang, Wenbo Liu, Peng Luo, Lei Zhang, Yuan Wang, Zhanjiang Wang, Zhou Fei

Abstract

In current military conflicts and civilian terrorism, blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) is the primary cause of neurotrauma. However, the effects and mechanisms of bTBI are poorly understood. Although previous researchers have made significant contributions to establishing animal models for the simulation of bTBI, the precision and controllability of blast-induced injury in animal models must be improved. Therefore, we established a novel rat model to simulate blast-wave injury to the brain. To simulate different extents of bTBI injury, the animals were divided into moderate and severe injury groups. The miniature spherical explosives (pentaerythritol tetranitrate) used in each group were of different sizes (2.5 mm diameter in the moderate injury group and 3.0 mm diameter in the severe injury group). A specially designed apparatus was able to precisely adjust the positions of the miniature explosives and create eight rats with bTBI simultaneously, using a single electric detonator. Neurological functions, gross pathologies, histopathological changes and the expression levels of various biomarkers were examined after the explosion. Compared with the moderate injury group, there were significantly more neurological dysfunctions, cortical contusions, intraparenchymal hemorrhages, cortical expression of S-100β, myelin basic protein, neuron-specific enolase, IL-8, IL-10, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and HIF-1α in the severe injury group. These results demonstrate that we have created a reliable and reproducible bTBI model in rats. This model will be helpful for studying the mechanisms of bTBI and developing strategies for clinical bTBI treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Engineering 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,570
of 4,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,773
of 264,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#102
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.