↓ Skip to main content

Cell-type-specific tuning of Cav1.3 Ca2+-channels by a C-terminal automodulatory domain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell-type-specific tuning of Cav1.3 Ca2+-channels by a C-terminal automodulatory domain
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Scharinger, Stephanie Eckrich, David H. Vandael, Kai Schönig, Alexandra Koschak, Dietmar Hecker, Gurjot Kaur, Amy Lee, Anupam Sah, Dusan Bartsch, Bruno Benedetti, Andreas Lieb, Bernhard Schick, Nicolas Singewald, Martina J. Sinnegger-Brauns, Emilio Carbone, Jutta Engel, Jörg Striessnig

Abstract

Cav1.3 L-type Ca(2+)-channel function is regulated by a C-terminal automodulatory domain (CTM). It affects channel binding of calmodulin and thereby tunes channel activity by interfering with Ca(2+)- and voltage-dependent gating. Alternative splicing generates short C-terminal channel variants lacking the CTM resulting in enhanced Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation and stronger voltage-sensitivity upon heterologous expression. However, the role of this modulatory domain for channel function in its native environment is unkown. To determine its functional significance in vivo, we interrupted the CTM with a hemagglutinin tag in mutant mice (Cav1.3DCRD(HA/HA)). Using these mice we provide biochemical evidence for the existence of long (CTM-containing) and short (CTM-deficient) Cav1.3 α1-subunits in brain. The long (HA-labeled) Cav1.3 isoform was present in all ribbon synapses of cochlear inner hair cells. CTM-elimination impaired Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of Ca(2+)-currents in hair cells but increased it in chromaffin cells, resulting in hyperpolarized resting potentials and reduced pacemaking. CTM disruption did not affect hearing thresholds. We show that the modulatory function of the CTM is affected by its native environment in different cells and thus occurs in a cell-type specific manner in vivo. It stabilizes gating properties of Cav1.3 channels required for normal electrical excitability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 18 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,770,433
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,933
of 4,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,272
of 267,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#87
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.