↓ Skip to main content

Potentials and limits to enhance cognitive functions in healthy and pathological aging by tDCS

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potentials and limits to enhance cognitive functions in healthy and pathological aging by tDCS
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Prehn, Agnes Flöel

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to enhance the effects of cognitive training. In our present review, we will first summarize studies using tDCS alone and in combination with cognitive training in older adults and patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD). We will also review one study (Meinzer et al., 2014c) that showed an improvement in cognitive performance during anodal tDCS over the left inferior frontal cortex in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) which is regarded as a prodromal stage of AD. Although promising short-term results have been reported, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with sufficient sample sizes is scarce. In addition, stimulation protocols (in terms of intensity, duration, and repetition of stimulation) that lead to sustained improvements in outcome measures relevant for daily life still remain to be established. Following, we will discuss modulating factors such as technical parameters as well as the question whether there are specific cognitive functions (e.g., learning, memory consolidation, executive control) which are more amenable to tDCS enhancement than others. Finally, we will highlight future directions and limitations in this field and emphasize the need to conduct RCTs to establish efficacy of interventions for activities of daily life for a given patient population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 51 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 29%
Neuroscience 33 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,175,336
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,605
of 4,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,317
of 269,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#45
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.