You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Survey of Retinal Remodeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2015.00494 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enrica Strettoi |
| Abstract |
Up to 15 years ago, bibliographic searches based on keywords such as "photoreceptor degeneration, inner retina" or "photoreceptor degeneration, second order neurons" returned only a handful of papers, as the field was dominated by the general assumption that retinal degeneration had direct effects on the sole populations of rods and cones. Since then, a number of studies have been dedicated to understanding the process of gradual morphological, molecular, and functional changes arising among cells located in the inner retina (comprising neurons, glia, and blood vessels), that is to say "beyond" photoreceptors. General aspects of this progression of biological rearrangements, now referred to as "remodeling", were revealed and demonstrated to accompany consistently photoreceptor loss, independently from the underlying cause of degeneration. Recurrent features of remodeling are summarized here, to provide a general frame for to the various analytical descriptions and reviews contributed by the articles in the issue (among others, see Euler and Schubert, 2015; Soto and Kerschensteiner, 2015, this issue). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 20 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,582
of 4,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,693
of 390,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#84
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.