↓ Skip to main content

ATP Released by Injured Neurons Activates Schwann Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ATP Released by Injured Neurons Activates Schwann Cells
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2016.00134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuele Negro, Elisanna Bergamin, Umberto Rodella, Elisa Duregotti, Michele Scorzeto, Kees Jalink, Cesare Montecucco, Michela Rigoni

Abstract

Injured nerve terminals of neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) can regenerate. This remarkable and complex response is governed by molecular signals that are exchanged among the cellular components of this synapse: motor axon nerve terminal (MAT), perisynaptic Schwann cells (PSCs), and muscle fiber. The nature of signals that govern MAT regeneration is ill-known. In the present study the spider toxin α-latrotoxin has been used as tool to investigate the mechanisms underlying peripheral neuroregeneration. Indeed this neurotoxin induces an acute, specific, localized and fully reversible damage of the presynaptic nerve terminal, and its action mimics the cascade of events that leads to nerve terminal degeneration in injured patients and in many neurodegenerative conditions. Here we provide evidence of an early release by degenerating neurons of adenosine triphosphate as alarm messenger, that contributes to the activation of a series of intracellular pathways within Schwann cells that are crucial for nerve regeneration: Ca(2+), cAMP, ERK1/2, and CREB. These results contribute to define the cross-talk taking place among degenerating nerve terminals and PSCs, involved in the functional recovery of the NMJ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Researcher 8 18%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,805,172
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,947
of 4,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,758
of 333,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#56
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.