↓ Skip to main content

Synaptic Conductances during Interictal Discharges in Pyramidal Neurons of Rat Entorhinal Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synaptic Conductances during Interictal Discharges in Pyramidal Neurons of Rat Entorhinal Cortex
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2016.00233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dmitry V. Amakhin, Julia L. Ergina, Anton V. Chizhov, Aleksey V. Zaitsev

Abstract

In epilepsy, the balance of excitation and inhibition underlying the basis of neural network activity shifts, resulting in neuronal network hyperexcitability and recurrent seizure-associated discharges. Mechanisms involved in ictal and interictal events are not fully understood, in particular, because of controversial data regarding the dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances. In the present study, we estimated AMPAR-, NMDAR-, and GABAA R-mediated conductances during two distinct types of interictal discharge (IID) in pyramidal neurons of rat entorhinal cortex in cortico-hippocampal slices. Repetitively emerging seizure-like events and IIDs were recorded in high extracellular potassium, 4-aminopyridine, and reduced magnesium-containing solution. An original procedure for estimating synaptic conductance during IIDs was based on the differences among the current-voltage characteristics of the synaptic components. The synaptic conductance dynamics obtained revealed that the first type of IID is determined by activity of GABAA R channels with depolarized reversal potential. The second type of IID is determined by the interplay between excitation and inhibition, with early AMPAR and prolonged depolarized GABAA R and NMDAR-mediated components. The study then validated the contribution of these components to IIDs by intracellular pharmacological isolation. These data provide new insights into the mechanisms of seizures generation, development, and cessation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Engineering 5 15%
Linguistics 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,346,264
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,586
of 4,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,486
of 319,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#44
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.