↓ Skip to main content

Cellular Prion Protein (PrPc) and Hypoxia: True to Each Other in Good Times and in Bad, in Sickness, and in Health

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular Prion Protein (PrPc) and Hypoxia: True to Each Other in Good Times and in Bad, in Sickness, and in Health
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2016.00292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanja Ramljak, Holger Herlyn, Inga Zerr

Abstract

The cellular prion protein (PrP(c)) and hypoxia appear to be tightly intertwined. Beneficial effects of PrP(c) on neuronal survival under hypoxic conditions such as focal cerebral ischemia are strongly supported. Conversely, increasing evidence indicates detrimental effects of increased PrP(c) expression on cancer progression, another condition accompanied by low oxygen tensions. A switch between anaerobic and aerobic metabolism characterizes both conditions. A cellular process that might unite both is glycolysis. Putative role of PrP(c) in stimulation of glycolysis in times of need is indeed thought provoking. A significance of astrocytic PrP(c) expression for neuronal survival under hypoxic conditions and possible association of PrP(c) with the astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle is considered. We posit PrP(c)-induced lactate production via transactivation of lactate dehydrogenase A by hypoxia inducible factor 1α as an important factor for survival of both neurons and tumor cells in hypoxic microenvironment. Concomitantly, we discuss a cross-talk between Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways in executing PrP(c)-induced activation of glycolysis. Finally, we would like to emphasize that we see a great potential in joining expertise from both fields, neuroscience and cancer research in revealing the mechanisms underlying hypoxia-related pathologies. PrP(c) may prove focal point for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 35%
Neuroscience 4 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2016.
All research outputs
#17,842,847
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,945
of 4,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,196
of 420,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#47
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.