↓ Skip to main content

Motor and Cerebellar Architectural Abnormalities during the Early Progression of Ataxia in a Mouse Model of SCA1 and How Early Prevention Leads to a Better Outcome Later in Life

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motor and Cerebellar Architectural Abnormalities during the Early Progression of Ataxia in a Mouse Model of SCA1 and How Early Prevention Leads to a Better Outcome Later in Life
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2017.00292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed F. Ibrahim, Emmet M. Power, Kay Potapov, Ruth M. Empson

Abstract

Exposing developing cerebellar Purkinje neurons (PNs) to mutant Ataxin1 (ATXN1) in 82Q spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) mice disrupts motor behavior and cerebellar climbing fiber (CF) architecture from as early as 4 weeks of age. In contrast, if mutant ATXN1 expression is silenced until after cerebellar development is complete, then its impact on motor behavior and cerebellar architecture is greatly reduced. Under these conditions even 6 month old SCA1 mice exhibit largely intact motor behavior and molecular layer (ML) and CF architecture but show a modest reduction in PN soma area as a first sign of cerebellar disruption. Our results contrast the sensitivity of the developing cerebellum and remarkable resilience of the adult cerebellum to mutant ATXN1 and imply that SCA1 in this mouse model is both a developmental and neurodegenerative disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,955,443
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,408
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,495
of 318,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#70
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.