↓ Skip to main content

Cryopreservation of Primary Mouse Neurons: The Benefit of Neurostore Cryoprotective Medium

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryopreservation of Primary Mouse Neurons: The Benefit of Neurostore Cryoprotective Medium
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2018.00081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Pischedda, Caterina Montani, Julia Obergasteiger, Giulia Frapporti, Corrado Corti, Marcelo Rosato Siri, Mattia Volta, Giovanni Piccoli

Abstract

Primary neuronal culture from rodents is a well-established model to investigate cellular neurobiology in vitro. However, for this purpose cell cultures need to be generated expressly, requiring extensive animal handling. Furthermore, often the preparation of fresh culture generates an excess of cells that are ultimately wasted. Therefore the ability to successfully cryopreserve primary neural cells would represent an important resource for neuroscience research and would allow to significantly reduce the sacrifice of animals. We describe here a novel freezing medium that allows long-term cryopreservation of primary mouse neurons prepared from E15.5 embryos. Combining imaging, biochemical and electrophysiological analyses, we found that cryopreserved cultures are viable and mature regarding morphology and functionality. These findings suggest that cryopreserved neurons are a valuable alternative to acutely dissociated neural cultures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Chemistry 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 17 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,200,036
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#573
of 4,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,497
of 348,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#8
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.