↓ Skip to main content

Spike-Timing of Orbitofrontal Neurons Is Synchronized With Breathing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spike-Timing of Orbitofrontal Neurons Is Synchronized With Breathing
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2018.00105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Áron Kőszeghy, Bálint Lasztóczi, Thomas Forro, Thomas Klausberger

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been implicated in a multiplicity of complex brain functions, including representations of expected outcome properties, post-decision confidence, momentary food-reward values, complex flavors and odors. As breathing rhythm has an influence on odor processing at primary olfactory areas, we tested the hypothesis that it may also influence neuronal activity in the OFC, a prefrontal area involved also in higher order processing of odors. We recorded spike timing of orbitofrontal neurons as well as local field potentials (LFPs) in awake, head-fixed mice, together with the breathing rhythm. We observed that a large majority of orbitofrontal neurons showed robust phase-coupling to breathing during immobility and running. The phase coupling of action potentials to breathing was significantly stronger in orbitofrontal neurons compared to cells in the medial prefrontal cortex. The characteristic synchronization of orbitofrontal neurons with breathing might provide a temporal framework for multi-variable processing of olfactory, gustatory and reward-value relationships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 18 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Psychology 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,261,237
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#875
of 4,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,362
of 330,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#20
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.