↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2018.00197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alja Lüdke, Georg Raiser, Johannes Nehrkorn, Andreas V. M. Herz, C. Giovanni Galizia, Paul Szyszka

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 128 in vol. 12, PMID: 29867361.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,365
of 4,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,760
of 328,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#88
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.