You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Default Mode Network Structural Integrity and Cerebellar Connectivity Predict Information Processing Speed Deficit in Multiple Sclerosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2019.00021 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giovanni Savini, Matteo Pardini, Gloria Castellazzi, Alessandro Lascialfari, Declan Chard, Egidio D’Angelo, Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 22 | 26% |
Psychology | 11 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,923,416
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#805
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,694
of 443,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#29
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.