You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences of Microglia in the Brain and the Spinal Cord
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2019.00504 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fang-Ling Xuan, Keerthana Chithanathan, Kersti Lilleväli, Xiaodong Yuan, Li Tian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Italy | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 22 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,636,802
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#397
of 4,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,356
of 378,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#10
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.