You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Use of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells as a Model for Developmental Eye Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2020.00265 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Eintracht, Maria Toms, Mariya Moosajee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 42% |
| Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,353,301
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#646
of 4,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,220
of 428,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#23
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.