You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Passive Clearing and 3D Lightsheet Imaging of the Intact and Injured Spinal Cord in Mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2021.684792 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dylan A. McCreedy, Frank L. Jalufka, Madison E. Platt, Sun Won Min, Megan A. Kirchhoff, Anna L. Pritchard, Shelby K. Reid, Ronald Manlapaz, Eszter Mihaly, Jessica C. Butts, Nisha R. Iyer, Shelly E. Sakiyama-Elbert, Steven A. Crone, Todd C. McDevitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 64% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 12 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,204,324
of 24,987,787 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#883
of 4,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,787
of 426,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#42
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,987,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.