↓ Skip to main content

Discrimination and learning of temporal input sequences in a cerebellar Purkinje cell model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discrimination and learning of temporal input sequences in a cerebellar Purkinje cell model
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2023.1075005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaaya Tamura, Yuki Yamamoto, Taira Kobayashi, Rin Kuriyama, Tadashi Yamazaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,683,064
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,668
of 4,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,287
of 476,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#34
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.