↓ Skip to main content

In vivo Labeling of Constellations of Functionally Identified Neurons for Targeted in vitro Recordings

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo Labeling of Constellations of Functionally Identified Neurons for Targeted in vitro Recordings
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2011.00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony D. Lien, Massimo Scanziani

Abstract

Relating the functional properties of neurons in an intact organism with their cellular and synaptic characteristics is necessary for a mechanistic understanding of brain function. However, while the functional properties of cortical neurons (e.g., tuning to sensory stimuli) are necessarily determined in vivo, detailed cellular and synaptic analysis relies on in vitro techniques. Here we describe an approach that combines in vivo calcium imaging (for functional characterization) with photo-activation of fluorescent proteins (for neuron labeling), thereby allowing targeted in vitro recording of multiple neurons with known functional properties. We expressed photo-activatable GFP rendered non-diffusible through fusion with a histone protein (H2B-PAGFP) in the mouse visual cortex to rapidly photo-label constellations of neurons in vivo at cellular and sub-cellular resolution using two-photon excitation. This photo-labeling method was compatible with two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal responses to visual stimuli, allowing us to label constellations of neurons with specific functional properties. Photo-labeled neurons were easily identified in vitro in acute brain slices and could be targeted for whole-cell recording. We also demonstrate that in vitro and in vivo image stacks of the same photo-labeled neurons could be registered to one another, allowing the exact in vivo response properties of individual neurons recorded in vitro to be known. The ability to perform in vitro recordings from neurons with known functional properties opens up exciting new possibilities for dissecting the cellular, synaptic, and circuit mechanisms that underlie neuronal function in vivo.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 7%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 124 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 27%
Professor 10 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 41%
Neuroscience 38 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 17 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#775
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,042
of 180,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.