You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oculomotor learning revisited: a model of reinforcement learning in the basal ganglia incorporating an efference copy of motor actions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2012.00038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michale S. Fee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 28% |
| Researcher | 28 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,424,518
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#612
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,845
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#18
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.