↓ Skip to main content

Functional adaptation of cortical interneurons to attenuated activity is subtype-specific

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional adaptation of cortical interneurons to attenuated activity is subtype-specific
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2012.00066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theofanis Karayannis, Natalia V. De Marco García, Gordon J. Fishell

Abstract

Functional neuronal homeostasis has been studied in a variety of model systems and contexts. Many studies have shown that there are a number of changes that can be activated within individual cells or networks in order to compensate for perturbations or changes in levels of activity. Dissociating the cell autonomous from the network-mediated events has been complicated due to the difficulty of sparsely targeting specific populations of neurons in vivo. Here, we make use of a recent in vivo approach we developed that allows for the sparse labeling and manipulation of activity within superficial caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE)-derived GABAergic interneurons. Expression of the inward rectifying potassium channel Kir2.1 cell-autonomously reduced neuronal activity and lead to specific developmental changes in their intrinsic electrophysiological properties and the synaptic input they received. In contrast to previous studies on homeostatic scaling of pyramidal cells, we did not detect any of the typically observed compensatory mechanisms in these interneurons. Rather, we instead saw a specific alteration of the kinetics of excitatory synaptic events within the reelin-expressing subpopulation of interneurons. These results provide the first in vivo observations for the capacity of interneurons to cell-autonomously regulate their excitability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 65 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 35%
Researcher 22 31%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 5 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2012.
All research outputs
#17,666,399
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#846
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,325
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#32
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.