↓ Skip to main content

Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2012.00108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Egelhaaf, Norbert Boeddeker, Roland Kern, Rafael Kurtz, Jens P. Lindemann

Abstract

Insects such as flies or bees, with their miniature brains, are able to control highly aerobatic flight maneuvres and to solve spatial vision tasks, such as avoiding collisions with obstacles, landing on objects, or even localizing a previously learnt inconspicuous goal on the basis of environmental cues. With regard to solving such spatial tasks, these insects still outperform man-made autonomous flying systems. To accomplish their extraordinary performance, flies and bees have been shown by their characteristic behavioral actions to actively shape the dynamics of the image flow on their eyes ("optic flow"). The neural processing of information about the spatial layout of the environment is greatly facilitated by segregating the rotational from the translational optic flow component through a saccadic flight and gaze strategy. This active vision strategy thus enables the nervous system to solve apparently complex spatial vision tasks in a particularly efficient and parsimonious way. The key idea of this review is that biological agents, such as flies or bees, acquire at least part of their strength as autonomous systems through active interactions with their environment and not by simply processing passively gained information about the world. These agent-environment interactions lead to adaptive behavior in surroundings of a wide range of complexity. Animals with even tiny brains, such as insects, are capable of performing extraordinarily well in their behavioral contexts by making optimal use of the closed action-perception loop. Model simulations and robotic implementations show that the smart biological mechanisms of motion computation and visually-guided flight control might be helpful to find technical solutions, for example, when designing micro air vehicles carrying a miniaturized, low-weight on-board processor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
Canada 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 119 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 34%
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 38%
Engineering 16 12%
Computer Science 14 10%
Neuroscience 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2012.
All research outputs
#13,235,126
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#545
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,078
of 245,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#19
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.