↓ Skip to main content

Revealing the secrets of neuronal circuits with recombinant rabies virus technology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revealing the secrets of neuronal circuits with recombinant rabies virus technology
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2013.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Ginger, Matthias Haberl, Karl-Klaus Conzelmann, Martin K. Schwarz, Andreas Frick

Abstract

An understanding of how the brain processes information requires knowledge of the architecture of its underlying neuronal circuits, as well as insights into the relationship between architecture and physiological function. A range of sophisticated tools is needed to acquire this knowledge, and recombinant rabies virus (RABV) is becoming an increasingly important part of this essential toolbox. RABV has been recognized for years for its properties as a synapse-specific trans-neuronal tracer. A novel genetically modified variant now enables the investigation of specific monosynaptic connections. This technology, in combination with other genetic, physiological, optical, and computational tools, has enormous potential for the visualization of neuronal circuits, and for monitoring and manipulating their activity. Here we will summarize the latest developments in this fast moving field and provide a perspective for the use of this technology for the dissection of neuronal circuit structure and function in the normal and diseased brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Germany 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 379 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 98 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 22%
Student > Master 60 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 43 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 136 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 5%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 51 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,039,531
of 23,934,504 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#311
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,390
of 287,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#29
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,934,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.