↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive enhancement of learning protocol in hippocampal cultured networks grown on multielectrode arrays

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive enhancement of learning protocol in hippocampal cultured networks grown on multielectrode arrays
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2013.00087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexey Pimashkin, Arseniy Gladkov, Irina Mukhina, Victor Kazantsev

Abstract

Learning in neuronal networks can be investigated using dissociated cultures on multielectrode arrays supplied with appropriate closed-loop stimulation. It was shown in previous studies that weakly respondent neurons on the electrodes can be trained to increase their evoked spiking rate within a predefined time window after the stimulus. Such neurons can be associated with weak synaptic connections in nearby culture network. The stimulation leads to the increase in the connectivity and in the response. However, it was not possible to perform the learning protocol for the neurons on electrodes with relatively strong synaptic inputs and responding at higher rates. We proposed an adaptive closed-loop stimulation protocol capable to achieve learning even for the highly respondent electrodes. It means that the culture network can reorganize appropriately its synaptic connectivity to generate a desired response. We introduced an adaptive reinforcement condition accounting for the response variability in control stimulation. It significantly enhanced the learning protocol to a large number of responding electrodes independently on its base response level. We also found that learning effect preserved after 4-6 h after training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 3 4%
Japan 2 3%
Belgium 1 1%
France 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 60 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 41%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 26%
Engineering 16 23%
Neuroscience 8 12%
Computer Science 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,181,441
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#209
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,250
of 280,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#19
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.