↓ Skip to main content

Beyond “all-or-nothing” climbing fibers: graded representation of teaching signals in Purkinje cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond “all-or-nothing” climbing fibers: graded representation of teaching signals in Purkinje cells
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2013.00115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farzaneh Najafi, Javier F. Medina

Abstract

Arguments about the function of the climbing fiber (CF) input to the cerebellar cortex have fueled a rabid debate that started over 40 years ago, and continues to polarize the field to this day. The origin of the controversy can be traced back to 1969, the year David Marr published part of his dissertation work in a paper entitled "A theory of cerebellar cortex." In Marr's theory, CFs play a key role during the process of motor learning, providing an instructive signal that serves as a "teacher" for the post-synaptic Purkinje cells. Although this influential idea has found its way into the mainstream, a number of objections have been raised. For example, several investigators have pointed out that the seemingly "all-or-nothing" activation of the CF input provides little information and is too ambiguous to serve as an effective instructive signal. Here, we take a fresh look at these arguments in light of new evidence about the peculiar physiology of CFs. Based on recent findings we propose that at the level of an individual Purkinje cell, a graded instructive signal can be effectively encoded via pre- or post-synaptic modulation of its one and only CF input.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 127 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 26%
Researcher 33 24%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 46 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 33%
Engineering 10 7%
Psychology 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 14 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,728,060
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#850
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,354
of 280,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#104
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.