↓ Skip to main content

Tonotopic organization of the hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in the mammalian medial superior olive

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tonotopic organization of the hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in the mammalian medial superior olive
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2013.00117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronika J. Baumann, Simon Lehnert, Christian Leibold, Ursula Koch

Abstract

Neuronal membrane properties can largely vary even within distinct morphological cell classes. The mechanisms and functional consequences of this diversity, however, are little explored. In the medial superior olive (MSO), a brainstem nucleus that performs binaural coincidence detection, membrane properties at rest are largely governed by the hyperpolarization-activated inward current (Ih) which enables the temporally precise integration of excitatory and inhibitory inputs. Here, we report that Ih density varies along the putative tonotopic axis of the MSO with Ih being largest in ventral, high-frequency (HF) processing neurons. Also Ih half-maximal activation voltage and time constant are differentially distributed such that Ih of the putative HF processing neurons activate faster and at more depolarized levels. Intracellular application of saturating concentrations of cyclic AMP removed the regional difference in hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated (HCN) channel activation, but not Ih density. Experimental data in conjunction with a computational model suggest that increased Ih levels are helpful in counteracting temporal summation of phase-locked inhibitory inputs which is particularly prominent in HF neurons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Professor 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 38%
Neuroscience 13 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#933
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,040
of 280,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#119
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.