↓ Skip to main content

Inference of neuronal network spike dynamics and topology from calcium imaging data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inference of neuronal network spike dynamics and topology from calcium imaging data
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2013.00201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry Lütcke, Felipe Gerhard, Friedemann Zenke, Wulfram Gerstner, Fritjof Helmchen

Abstract

Two-photon calcium imaging enables functional analysis of neuronal circuits by inferring action potential (AP) occurrence ("spike trains") from cellular fluorescence signals. It remains unclear how experimental parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and acquisition rate affect spike inference and whether additional information about network structure can be extracted. Here we present a simulation framework for quantitatively assessing how well spike dynamics and network topology can be inferred from noisy calcium imaging data. For simulated AP-evoked calcium transients in neocortical pyramidal cells, we analyzed the quality of spike inference as a function of SNR and data acquisition rate using a recently introduced peeling algorithm. Given experimentally attainable values of SNR and acquisition rate, neural spike trains could be reconstructed accurately and with up to millisecond precision. We then applied statistical neuronal network models to explore how remaining uncertainties in spike inference affect estimates of network connectivity and topological features of network organization. We define the experimental conditions suitable for inferring whether the network has a scale-free structure and determine how well hub neurons can be identified. Our findings provide a benchmark for future calcium imaging studies that aim to reliably infer neuronal network properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Switzerland 5 2%
Germany 5 2%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 299 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 33%
Researcher 69 21%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 43 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 30%
Neuroscience 86 26%
Engineering 28 8%
Physics and Astronomy 24 7%
Computer Science 18 5%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 42 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,520,050
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#448
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,911
of 289,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#43
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.