↓ Skip to main content

The brain creates illusions not just for us: sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) can “see the magic” as well

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The brain creates illusions not just for us: sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) can “see the magic” as well
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2014.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theodora Fuss, Horst Bleckmann, Vera Schluessel

Abstract

Bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) were tested for their ability to perceive subjective and illusionary contours as well as line length illusions. Individuals were first trained to differentiate between squares, triangles, and rhomboids in a series of two alternative forced-choice experiments. Transfer tests then elucidated whether Kanizsa squares and triangles, grating gaps and phase shifted abutting gratings were also perceived and distinguished. The visual systems of most vertebrates and even invertebrates perceive illusionary contours despite the absence of physical luminance, color or textural differences. Sharks are no exception to the rule; all tasks were successfully mastered within 3-24 training sessions, with sharks discriminating between various sets of Kanizsa figures and alternative stimuli, as well as between subjective contours in >75% of all tests. However, in contrast to Kanizsa figures and subjective contours, sharks were not deceived by Müller-Lyer (ML) illusions. Here, two center lines of equal length are comparatively set between two arrowheads or -tails, in which case the line featuring the two arrow tails appears to be longer to most humans, primates and birds. In preparation for this experiment, lines of varying length, and lines of unequal length randomly featuring either two arrowheads or -tails on their ends, were presented first. Both sets of lines were successfully distinguished by most sharks. However, during presentation of the ML illusions sharks failed to succeed and succumbed either to side preferences or chose according to chance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Kazakhstan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 46%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,994,569
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#85
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,474
of 223,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.