↓ Skip to main content

The role of prefrontal catecholamines in attention and working memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of prefrontal catecholamines in attention and working memory
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2014.00033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey L. Clark, Behrad Noudoost

Abstract

While much progress has been made in identifying the brain regions and neurochemical systems involved in the cognitive processes disrupted in mental illnesses, to date, the level of detail at which neurobiologists can describe the chain of events giving rise to cognitive functions is very rudimentary. Much of the intense interest in understanding cognitive functions is motivated by the hope that it might be possible to understand these complex functions at the level of neurons and neural circuits. Here, we review the current state of the literature regarding how modulations in catecholamine levels within the prefrontal cortex (PFC) alter the neuronal and behavioral correlates of cognitive functions, particularly attention and working memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 185 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 51 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 19%
Psychology 19 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 33 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,586,267
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#223
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,621
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.