↓ Skip to main content

Robust quantification of orientation selectivity and direction selectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robust quantification of orientation selectivity and direction selectivity
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2014.00092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Mazurek, Marisa Kager, Stephen D. Van Hooser

Abstract

Neurons in the visual cortex of all examined mammals exhibit orientation or direction tuning. New imaging techniques are allowing the circuit mechanisms underlying orientation and direction selectivity to be studied with clarity that was not possible a decade ago. However, these new techniques bring new challenges: robust quantitative measurements are needed to evaluate the findings from these studies, which can involve thousands of cells of varying response strength. Here we show that traditional measures of selectivity such as the orientation index (OI) and direction index (DI) are poorly suited for quantitative evaluation of orientation and direction tuning. We explore several alternative methods for quantifying tuning and for addressing a variety of questions that arise in studies on orientation- and direction-tuned cells and cell populations. We provide recommendations for which methods are best suited to which applications and we offer tips for avoiding potential pitfalls in applying these methods. Our goal is to supply a solid quantitative foundation for studies involving orientation and direction tuning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 232 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 33%
Researcher 55 22%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Master 17 7%
Other 11 4%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 82 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 41 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,198,017
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#660
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,883
of 230,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.