↓ Skip to main content

Mouse vision as a gateway for understanding how experience shapes neural circuits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mouse vision as a gateway for understanding how experience shapes neural circuits
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2014.00123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J. Priebe, Aaron W. McGee

Abstract

Genetic programs controlling ontogeny drive many of the essential connectivity patterns within the brain. Yet it is activity, derived from the experience of interacting with the world, that sculpts the precise circuitry of the central nervous system. Such experience-dependent plasticity has been observed throughout the brain but has been most extensively studied in the neocortex. A prime example of this refinement of neural circuitry is found in primary visual cortex (V1), where functional connectivity changes have been observed both during development and in adulthood. The mouse visual system has become a predominant model for investigating the principles that underlie experience-dependent plasticity, given the general conservation of visual neural circuitry across mammals as well as the powerful tools and techniques recently developed for use in rodent. The genetic tractability of mice has permitted the identification of signaling pathways that translate experience-driven activity patterns into changes in circuitry. Further, the accessibility of visual cortex has allowed neural activity to be manipulated with optogenetics and observed with genetically-encoded calcium sensors. Consequently, mouse visual cortex has become one of the dominant platforms to study experience-dependent plasticity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 186 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 30%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 22 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 76 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Engineering 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 33 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,778,674
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#569
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,442
of 265,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.