You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of social behavior in young zebrafish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2015.00039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Dreosti, Gonçalo Lopes, Adam R. Kampff, Stephen W. Wilson |
| Abstract |
Adult zebrafish are robustly social animals whereas larva is not. We designed an assay to determine at what stage of development zebrafish begin to interact with and prefer other fish. One week old zebrafish do not show significant social preference whereas most 3 weeks old zebrafish strongly prefer to remain in a compartment where they can view conspecifics. However, for some individuals, the presence of conspecifics drives avoidance instead of attraction. Social preference is dependent on vision and requires viewing fish of a similar age/size. In addition, over the same 1-3 weeks period larval zebrafish increasingly tend to coordinate their movements, a simple form of social interaction. Finally, social preference and coupled interactions are differentially modified by an NMDAR antagonist and acute exposure to ethanol, both of which are known to alter social behavior in adult zebrafish. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Portugal | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 355 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 15% |
| Researcher | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 89 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 74 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 12% |
| Psychology | 14 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 11% |
| Unknown | 102 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,290,480
of 25,216,325 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#182
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,863
of 272,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,216,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.